Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 94 Download : 85

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to find ways to build an anti-fragile supply chain based on the perspective of SMEs in Kediri Regency. This research conducts observations on phenomena intensively and is practice-oriented using case study qualitative methods. The findings of the theme show that the character of MSME actors who master the fields, language, art of communication, can establish closeness with customers through interaction, reduce dependence on suppliers and the willingness to grow in uncertainty and/or disruption are the keys for MSMEs to be able to build and manage anti-corruption supply chains fragile.


 


Abstrak


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan cara membangun rantai pasok anti rapuh berdasarkan perspektif UMKM yang ada di Kabupaten Kediri. Penelitian ini melakukan pengamatan pada fenomena secara intensif dan berorientasi pada praktik (practice oriented research) menggunakan metode kualitatif studi kasus. Adapun hasil temuan tema menunjukkan bahwa karakter pelaku UMKM yang menguasai bidang, bahasa, seni berkomunikasi, dapat menjalin kedekatan dengan pelanggan melalui interaksi, mengurangi ketergantungan dengan pemasok serta kemauan untuk bertumbakuh dalam ketidakpastian dan/ gangguan menjadi kunci UMKM dapat membangun dan mengelola rantai pasok yang anti rapuh.

Keywords

Antifragility SCM Disruption Supply Chain Management

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Diah Ayu Septi Fauji, Sudarmiatin, Agus Hermawan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Nikookar E, Varsei M, Wieland A. Gaining from disorder: Making the case for antifragility in purchasing and supply chain management. J Purch Supply Manag 2021;27:100699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2021.100699.
  2. Taleb NN. Antifragile: Things That Gain From Disorder. The Random House Publishing Group, a division of Random House, Inc., New York.; 2012.
  3. Derbyshire J, Wright G. Preparing for the future: Development of an “antifragile” methodology that complements scenario planning by omitting causation. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2014;82:215–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.07.001.
  4. Zsidisin GA, Lamming R, Harland C, Wynstra F, Ancarani A, Tate WL, et al. Reflecting on the past 25 years of the journal of purchasing and supply management: The editors″ perspectives. J Purch Supply Manag 2019;25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100559.
  5. Govindan K, Mina H, Alavi B. A decision support system for demand management in healthcare supply chains considering the epidemic outbreaks: A case study of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 2020;138:101967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101967.
  6. Peck H. Drivers of supply chain vulnerability: An integrated framework. Int J Phys Distrib Logist
  7. Manag 2005;35:210–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030510599904.
  8. Knight L, Meehan J, Tapinos E, Menzies L, Pfeiffer A. Researching the future of purchasing and supply management: The purpose and potential of scenarios. J Purch Supply Manag 2020;26:100624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100624.
  9. Remko van H. Research opportunities for a more resilient post-COVID-19 supply chain – closing the gap between research findings and industry practice. Int J Oper Prod Manag 2020;40:341–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2020-0165.
  10. Myers MD. Qualitative Research in Business & Management. SAGE Publications Inc.; 2013.
  11. Derwik P, Hellström D. Competence in supply chain management: a systematic review. Supply Chain Manag 2017;22:200–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2016-0324.
  12. Tassabehji R. Understanding e-auction use by procurement professionals: Motivation, attitudes and perceptions. Supply Chain Manag 2010;15:425–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541011080419.
  13. Le Deist FD, Winterton J. What is competence? Hum Resour Dev Int 2005;8:27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/1367886042000338227.
  14. Campion MA, Fink A a, Ruggeberg BJ, Carr L, Philips GM, Odman RB. Doin Competencies Well: Best Practices In Competency Modeling. Pers Psychol 2011;64:225–62.
  15. Honoring AF, Fiske DW, Shrout PE, Fiske ST. Personality Research, Methods, and Theory. Personal Res Methods, Theory 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315806815.
  16. Bals L, Schulze H, Kelly S, Stek K. Purchasing and supply management (PSM) competencies: Current and future requirements. J Purch Supply Manag 2019;25:100572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100572.
  17. Chardine-Baumann E, Botta-Genoulaz V. A framework for sustainable performance assessment of supply chain management practices. Comput Ind Eng 2014;76:138–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.07.029.
  18. Halley A, Beaulieu M. Mastery of operational competencies in the context of supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag 2009;14:49–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540910927304.
  19. Tatham P, Wu Y, Kovács G, Butcher T. Supply chain management skills to sense and seize opportunities. Int J Logist Manag 2017;28:266–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-04-2014-0066.
  20. Tassabehji R, Moorhouse A. The changing role of procurement: Developing professional effectiveness. J Purch Supply Manag 2008;14:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2008.01.005.
  21. Christopher M, Holweg M. “Supply Chain 2.0”: Managing supply chains in the era of turbulence. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 2011;41:63–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031111101439.
  22. Stock JR, Boyer SL. Developing a consensus definition of supply chain management: A qualitative study. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 2009;39:690–711. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030910996323.
  23. Al- Qur’an Al- Karim. n.d.