Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to portray the results of remote auditing practices using simple facilities can meet auditing standards and able to convince auditors of management's assertions. The research method used is qualitative with a case study approach. The results prove that the switch from auditing practice to remote auditing does not mean that it does not meet the Auditing Standards. Procedurally, the management's assertions are fullfiled. However, the meaning indicates that the Auditor is not fully convinced and has an effect on the code of ethics of professional skepticism. In order to increase confidence in these management assertions, it’s necessary to increase the use of technologies such as blockchain, cloud computing and Big Data.


 


Abstrak


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memotret hasil praktik remote auditing dengan menggunakan fasilitas yang sederhana dapat memenuhi standar audit dan mampu meyakinkan auditor atas asersi manajemen. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa beralihnya praktik audit ke remote auditing bukan berarti tidak memenuhi standar audit, bahkan secara prosedural asersi manajemennya terpenuhi. Tetapi, secara makna mengindikasikan adanya pengaruh kode etik skeptisisme profesional, bahwa Auditor tidak memiliki keyakinan sepenuhnya atas asersi manajemen. Guna meningkatkan keyakinan atas asersi manajemen tersebut, perlu adanya peningkatan penggunaan teknologi seperti, blockchain, cloud computing, dan Big Data.

Keywords

Covid-19 Management’s Assertion Remote Auditing

Article Details

References

  1. IIA Australia. Factsheet: Remote Auditing 2020.
  2. Ikatan Akuntan Publik Indonesia. Respons Auditor atas Pandemi COVID-19: Terhadap Laporan Keuangan, Prosedur Audit, dan Pertimbangan Praktis Penunjang Kualitas Audit. Inst Akuntan Publik Indones 2020:1–20.
  3. Alexander A, De Smet A, Langstaff M, Ravid D. What employees are saying about the future of remote work. McKinsey Co 2021:1–13.
  4. Teeter RA, Alles MG, Vasarhelyi MA. Remote Audit: A Research Framework. SSRN Electron J 2012. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1668638.
  5. IAPI. Standar Audit 200. Standar Prof Akuntan Publik 2018.
  6. Randal J. Elder, Mark S. Beasley, Alvin A. Arens dan AAJ. Jasa Audit dan Assurance: Pendekatan Terpadu (Adaptasi Indonesia). 2011.
  7. Fitriana L, Permana M. Remote Audit sebagai Prosedur Audit Alternatif Inspektorat Daerah Provinsi Papua Barat pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Igya Ser Hanjop J Pembang Berkelanjutan 2021;3:15–23. https://doi.org/10.47039/ish.3.2021.15-23.
  8. Tedjasuksmana B. Optimalisasi Teknologi Dimasa Pandemi Melalui Audit Jarak Jauh Dalam Profesi Audit Internal. Pros Senapan 2021;1:313–23.
  9. Zahra RS. Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional Dan Kompetensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Jarak Jauh Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Surabaya. J Ilm Mhs FEB 2021;9.
  10. Azizah F. The 1st Universitas Kristen Indonesia Paulus International Conference 2021:71.
  11. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. Technology Disruption in Audit and Assurance. IAASB Main Agenda Jan 2021 2020:1–19.
  12. Sugiyono. Metode penelitian pendidikan : Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D / Sugiyono. 2015.
  13. Kamayanti A. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Akuntansi: Pengantar Religiositas Keilmuan. 2016.
  14. IAI. Bukti Audit. BUKTI Audit PSA No 07 2001:326.1-326.6.
  15. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. Kode Etik Akuntan Indonesia. 2020.
  16. Yelza Diasca, Shinta Indri Asdina Putri, Siti Asri Septiani, Siti Fatimah, Ufara Al Amri, Vitasya Utami Marsu Marsa AG. Tinjauan Teknologi Blockchain Dalam Audit Cryptocurrency 2021:1150–5.
  17. Kesuma JT. Peran Smart Contract di Dunia Auditing. Account Binus 2021. https://accounting.binus.ac.id/2021/12/27/peran-smart-contract-di-duniaauditing/.
  18. Geroni D. Private Blockchain Vs Consortium Blockchain. 03 November 2020. 101 Blockchains 2020. https://101blockchains.com/privateblockchain-vs-consortiumblockchain/.
  19. Brown-Liburd, H., Issa, H., and Lombardi D. Behavioral implications of Big Data’s impact on audit judgment and decision making and future research directions. Account Horizons 2015;29:451–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51023.
  20. Yoon K, Hoogduin L, Zhang L. Big data as complementary audit evidence. Account Horizons 2015;29:431–8. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51076.