Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 131 Download : 75

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between Knowledge Management Sharing and Green Process Innovation to Corporate Sustainable Development. This is a quantitative study using the Ordinary Least Squares regression technique. The study's population comprises companies that received awards in the Asia Sustainability Reporting Rating between 2018 and 2020. This study employed a purposive sampling technique. The analysis's findings indicate that Knowledge Management Sharing requires an antecedent to achieve Corporate Sustainable Development, while Green Process Innovation is proven to be able to encourage the creation of Corporate Sustainable Development.


 


Abstrak


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh Knowledge Management Sharing dan Green Process Innovation terhadap Corporate Sustainable Development. Jenis penelitian adalah kuantitatif dengan metode regresi Ordinary Least Square. Populasi penelitian adalah perusahaan yang meraih penghargaan dalam Asia Sustainability Reporting Rating selama periode 2018-2020. Teknik purposive sampling digunakan peneliti. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa Knowledge Management Sharing memerlukan suatu anteseden untuk mencapai Corporate Sustainable Development sedangkan Green Process Innovation terbukti mampu mendorong terciptanya Corporate Sustainable Development.

Keywords

Corporate Sustainable Development Green Process Innovation Knowledge Management

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Annisa Wulandari, Dina Indriana, Arya Aji Aditya

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Statistik BP. Perkembangan Indeks Produksi Industri Manufaktur 2017-2019 2019.
  2. Riska Adianti; Sherly Mardiyah;Winda Sartika Purba. Badan Pusat Statistik. 1384.
  3. Abbas J, Sağsan M. Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: A structural analysis. J Clean Prod 2019;229:611–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.024.
  4. Mardani A, Nikoosokhan S, Moradi M, Doustar M. The RelationshipBetween Knowledge Management and Innovation Performance. J High Technol Manag Res 2018;29:12–26. doi: 10.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.002.
  5. Habib M, Abbas J, Noman R. Are human capital, intellectual property rights, and research and development expenditures really important for total factor productivity? An empirical analysis. Int J Soc Econ 2019;46:756–74. doi: 10.1108/IJSE-09-2018-0472.
  6. Chen YS, Lai SB, Wen CT. The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. J Bus Ethics 2006;67:331–9. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5.
  7. Abu Seman NA, Govindan K, Mardani A, Zakuan N, Mat Saman MZ, Hooker RE, et al. The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance. J Clean Prod 2019;229:115–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.211.
  8. Xie X, Zhu Q, Wang R. Turning green subsidies into sustainability: How green process innovation improves firms’ green image. Bus Strateg Environ 2019;28:1416–33. doi: 10.1002/bse.2323. [9] Melander L. Achieving Sustainable Development by Collaborating in Green Product Innovation. Bus Strateg Environ 2017;26:1095–109. doi: 10.1002/bse.1970.
  9. Tseng SM. The impact of knowledge management capabilities and supplier relationship management on corporate performance. Int J Prod Econ2014;154:39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.04.009.
  10. Mark C. Managing legitimacy : Strategic and institutional approaches 1995.
  11. Wong SKS. Environmental requirements, knowledge sharing and green innovation: Empirical evidence from the electronics industry in China. Bus Strateg Environ 2013;22:321–38.doi: 10.1002/bse.1746.
  12. Wang X, Feng Z. Energy consumptionwith sustainable development in developing country: A case in Jiangsu, China. Energy Policy 2003;31:1679–84. doi: 10.1016/S0301-
  13. (02)00234-3.
  14. Yumashev A, Kondrashev S, Mikhaylov A, Slusarczyk B. Global Indicators of Sustainable Development: Evaluation of the Influence of the Human. Energies 2020:13.
  15. Alam S, Fatima A, Butt MS. Sustainable development in Pakistan in the context of energy consumption demand and environmental degradation. J Asian Econ 2007;18:825–37. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2007.07.005.
  16. Zhang D, Rong Z, Ji Q. Green innovation and firm performance: Evidence from listed companies in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 2019;144:48–55. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.023.
  17. Lee JN. The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success. Inf Manag 2001;38:323–35. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00074-4.
  18. Mooradian T, Renzl B, Matzler K. Who trusts? Personality, trust and knowledge sharing. Manag Learn 2006;37:523–40. doi: 10.1177/1350507606073424.
  19. Cummings JN. Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization. Manage Sci 2004;50:352–64. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134.
  20. Xie X, Huo J, Zou H. Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. J Bus Res 2019;101:697–706. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010.
  21. Yüksel H. An empirical evaluation of cleaner production practices in Turkey. J Clean Prod 2008;16:S50–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.003.
  22. Zeng SX, Meng XH, Yin HT, Tam CM, Sun L. Impact of cleaner production on business performance. J Clean Prod 2010;18:975–83. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.019.
  23. Frondel M, Horbach J, Rennings K. End of Pipe or Cleaner Production? An Empirical Comparison of Environmental Innovation Decisions Across OECD Countries. Bus Strateg Environ 2007;16:571–84. doi: 10.1002/bse.496.
  24. Hammar H, Löfgren Å. Explaining adoption of end of pipe solutions and clean technologies-Determinants of firms’ investments for reducing emissions to air in four sectors in Sweden. Energy Policy 2010;38:3644–51. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.041.
  25. Shahzad M, Qu Y, Zafar AUZ, Rehman SU, Islam T. Exploring the influence of knowledge management process on corporate sustainable performance through green innovation. J Knowl Manag 2020;24:2079–106. doi: 10.1108/JKM-11-2019-0624.
  26. Wong SKS. Environmental Requirements, Knowledge Sharing and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from the Electronics Industry in China. Bus Strateg Environ 2013;22:321–38. doi: doi:10.1002/bse.1746.
  27. Zhao S, Jiang Y, Peng X, Hong J. Knowledge sharing direction and innovation performance in organizations: Do absorptive capacity and individual creativity matter? Eur J Innov Manag 2020;24:371–94. doi:10.1108/EJIM-09-2019-0244.
  28. Dai R, Zhang J. Green process innovation and differentiated pricing strategies with environmental concerns of South-North markets. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 2017;98:132–50. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.12.009.
  29. Zhang F, Zhu L. Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation. Bus Strateg Environ 2019;28:1012–26. doi: 10.1002/bse.2298