Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 126 Download : 92

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The aim of this research is to know the response of the PT. PJB CSR programs over the perceptions and importance of the community. The method used was quantitative descriptive methods. The sampling of the data is taken based on purposive sampling type of nonprobabi-lity sampling. The population are 1228 people and the sample are 135 people, by using Importance Performance Analysis (IPA). This re-search conclude that PT PJB’s PLTU Rembang CSR based on the public perception are already in good category and the community have high expectations over the PJB CSR programs. However, there are several aspects which have to be fixed, include provide ambulance car, controlling pollution, processing sewage with 3R (reduce, reuse, recycle) treatment, organize empowerment and training program for com-munity, willing to absorb local workforces who are eligible to fulfill the requirements, organize UKM empowerment program.


Abstrak


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tanggapan masyarakat terhadap program tanggung jawab sosial (CSR) PT. PJB atas persepsi dan kepentingan masyarakat. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif kuantitatif. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan metode nonprobability sampling jenis purposive sampling. Jumlah populasi 1228 orang dan jumlah sampel sebanyak 135 orang, yaitu masyarakat ring 1 sekitar PT PJB PLTU Rembang. Pengolahan data menggunakan metode Importance Performance Analysis (IPA). Program CSR PT PJB PLTU Rembang berdasarkan persepsi masyarakat sudah berada dalam kategori cukup baik dan masyarakat mempunyai harapan yang tinggi atas program CSR PJB. Namun ada beberapa aspek yang harus diperbaiki, yaitu memberikan bantuan mobil ambulance, melakukan pengendalian polusi, melakukan pengolahan limbah 3R (reduce, reuse, recycle), mengadakan program pemberdayaan dan pelatihan masyarakat, bersedia menyerap tenaga kerja lokal yang memenuhi syarat, serta mengadakan program pemberdayaan UKM.

Keywords

Tanggung jawab Sosial Perusahaan Importance Performance Analysis (IPA)

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Astadi Pangarso, Mohammad Ardi Periyanto, Candra Wijayangka Wijayangka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Barnett, M. L. (2005). Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794-816.
  2. Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. and Drumwright, M. E.(2007). Mainstreaming Corporate Social Responsibility: Developing Markets for Virtue.California Management Review. 49(4), 132157.
  3. Branco, M. C. & Rodrigues L, L. (2007). Positioning Stakeholder Theory within the Debate on Corporate Social Responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 12(1), 5-15.
  4. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. 2010. The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice.International Journal of ManagementReviews, 12(1), 85-105.
  5. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. 2007. Reaping Relational Rewards from Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Competitive Positioning. International of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224-241.
  6. Du, S., Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. 2008.Exploring the Social and Business Returns of a Corporate Oral Health Initiative Aimed at Disadvantaged Hispanic Families. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 483-494.
  7. Eklington, J. 2004. “Enter The Triple Bottom Line”.http://www.johnelkington.com/. Diakses tanggal 25 April 2015.Goel, P. (2010). Triple Bottom Line Reporting: an Analytical Approach for Corporate Sustainability, Journal of Finance, Accounting, and Management, 1(1), 27-42.
  8. International Organization for Standardization. 2010.Draft international standard ISO/DIS 26000: Guidance on social responsibility.
  9. Lopez, M., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007).Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance: a Study Based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 285–300.
  10. Martilla, J.A. & James, J.C. (1977). Importance Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79.PT. Pembangkit Jawa Bali. Website resmi PT. PJB.http://www.ptpjb.com/. Diakses tanggal 25 November 2014.
  11. Riswari, D. A. dan Cahyonowati, N. 2012. Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility terhadap Nilai Perusahaan dengan Corporate Governance sebagai Variabel Moderating: Studi pada Perusahaan Publik Non Finansial yangTercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 1 (1), 1-12.
  12. Rogers, K., & Hudson, B. (2011). The Triple Bottom Line: The Synergies of Transformative Perceptions and Practices of Sustainability.OD Practitioner, 4(43), 3-9.
  13. Sankar, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Daniel, K. 2006.The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relation-ships: A Field Experiment. Academy of Mar-keting Science Journal, 34 (2), 158166.
  14. Uddin, M.B., Hassan, M. R., &Tarique, K. M. 2008.Three Dimensional Aspects of Corporate Social Responsibility. Daffodil International University Journal of Business andEconomics, 3 (1), 199-212.
  15. Wibisono, Yusuf. 2007. Membedah Konsep & Aplikasi CSR (Corporate SocialResponsibility), Gresik: Fascho Publishing.