Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 69 Download : 68

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The aims of this study are to examine the impacts of liberalization policy on the monopoly postal service market in developing countries like Indonesia. Liberalization policy has altered the business and way of State Owned Enterprise (SOE) to run its social welfare functions. Using the case of PT Pos Indonesia through quantitative methods to support qualitative analysis, this study reveals that liberalization is potential to promote the company’s financial and efficiency performance, unless the government clearly determines about its socio-economic function on SOE.


 


Abstrak


Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menguji dampak kebijakan liberalisasi atas monopoli layanan pos di negara berkembang seperti Indonesia. Diterbitkannya kebijakan liberalisasi layanan pos berdampak pada proses bisnis dan operasi pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) dalam menjalankan fungsi kesejahteraan sosial. Melalui telaah kasus PT Pos Indonesia menggunakan metode kuantitatif untuk mendukung analisis kualitatif, penelitian ini mengindikasikan bahwa kebijakan liberalisasi dapat berpotensi memperbaiki kinerja keuangan dan efisiensi perusahaan, hanya jika pemerintah secara jelas menentukan fungsi sosio-ekonomi yang dijalankan oleh BUMN.

Keywords

Financial Performance Liberalization policy Postal Services

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Andriati Fitriningrum, Andrey Hasiholan Pulungan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Abramov A, Radygin A, Entov R, Chernova M. State ownership and efficiency characteristics. Russ J Econ 2017;3:129–57. doi:10.1016/j.ruje.2017.06.002.
  2. Assagaf A, Ali H. Determinants of Financial Performance of State-Owned Enterprises with Government Subsidy as Moderator. Int J Econ Financ Issues 2017;7:330–42.
  3. Asian Development Bank on the Privatization of Public Sector Enterprises. 2017.
  4. Abeng T. Professionalisme versus Politik: Tanri Abeng Menjawab. PT. Elex Media Komputindo; 2002.
  5. Martin J. Corporatisation and community service obligations: Are they incompatible? Aust J Public Adm 1996.
  6. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.1996.tb01229.x.
  7. De Donder P, Cremer H, Rodriguez F. Funding the Universal Service Obligation under Liberalisation. Post. Deliv. Serv., Boston, MA: Springer US; 2002, p. 31–52.
  8. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0253-7_2.
  9. Setiawan H. Membedah Laba BUMN PSO Study Kasus PT Pos Indonesia. Info Risiko Fiskal 2012.
  10. Chen S, Sun Z, Tang S, Wu D. Government intervention and investment efficiency: Evidence from China. J Corp Financ 2011. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.08.004.
  11. Bel G, Calzada J. Privatization and Universal Service Obligations. J Institutional Theor Econ 2009;165:650. doi:10.1628/093245609789919685.
  12. Aulakh PS, Kotabe M. Institutional changes and organizational transformation in developing economies. J Int Manag 2008. doi:10.1016/j.intman.2008.04.001.
  13. Neumann W. Social Research Method. Boston: Pearson (Ally and Bacon); 2006.
  14. Punch K. Mixed Methods and Evaluation. Introd to Soc Res Quant Qual Approaches 2006:301–26.
  15. Bennett A. Case Study Methods: Design, Use and Comparative Advantages. Model. Numbers Cases - Methods Stud. Int. Relations, 2004.
  16. PT. Pos Indonesia (Persero): Financial Report Consolidation. 2018.
  17. Brand rejuvenation : agile, adaptable, properly (PT Pos Indonesia Annual Report). 2017.
  18. No Unlocking the Unknown: People, Network, Technology (PT Pos Indonesia Annual Report). 2016.
  19. Bruno L. Business statistics: A decision-making approach. 2019.
  20. Errunza VR, Mazumdar SC. Privatization: A theoretical framework. J Int Financ Mark Institutions Money 2001.
  21. doi:10.1016/S1042-4431(01)00038-5.
  22. Empowerment & modernization (PT Pos Indonesia Annual Report). 2010.
  23. PT Pos Indonesia Annual Report. 2011.
  24. Business Revitalization for Creating Value (PT Pos Indonesia Annual Report). 2015.
  25. Building Integrity and Trust (PT Pos Indonesia Annual Report). 2014.
  26. Move on to A Brighter Future (PT Pos Indonesia Annual Report). 2013.
  27. Aiming Higher Achieving More (PT Pos Indonesia Annual Report). 2012.
  28. Bárcena-Ruiz JC, Garzón MB. Relocation and public ownership of firms. J Jpn Int Econ 2009. doi:10.1016/j.jjie.2009.01.002.
  29. Layanan Operasional Universal Post. 2013