Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract


This research aims to update technology capability 4.0 as the goal of the achievement of accounting learning with a Javanese philosophy momong, among and ngemong. The philosophy of learning heutagogis by giving choices and opportunities to design learning process. Descriptive qualitative methods through interviews were used in this study. The results explain accounting 4.0 design that fosters convergence of knowledge and technology. This convergence makes development of adaptive accounting. The process of continuous free of learning transdi-sciplinary accounting momong, among and ngemon, because this concept puts forward a dynamic and flexible egalitarian pedagogy to explore scholar creatively, independently and responsibly.


 


Abstrak


Penelitian untuk mengupdate kapabilitas teknologi 4.0 sebagai tujuan capaian pembelajaran akuntansi dengan pendekatan falsafah Jawa momong, among dan ngemong. Falsafah belajar heutagogis dengan memberi pilihan dan peluang mendesain proses pembelajaran. Metode kualitatif deskriptif melalui wawancara digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Hasil menjelaskan desain akuntansi 4.0 yang menumbuhkan konvergensi pengetahuan dan teknologi. Konvergensi ini membuat pengembangan akuntansi adaptif. Proses keleluasaan berkelanjutan belajar akuntansi transdisipliner momong, among dan ngemong, karena konsep ini mengedepankan pedagogi egalitarian dinamis dan fleksibel untuk mengeksplorasi mahasiswa secara kreatif, mandiri dan bertanggung jawab.

Keywords

Transdicplinary accounting Momong Among Ngemong Egalitarian pedagory

Article Details

References

  1. Arsian, M. L. (2018). Revolution Industry 4.0 for Accounting Education. Makalah dalam The 4th International Conference on Accounting and Finance, 25-26 April. Yogyakarta.
  2. Bungin, B. (2010). Analisis Data Penelitian Kuantitatif: Pemahaman Filosofi dan Metodologis ke Arah Penguasaan Model Aplikasi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  3. Creswell, J. W. (2015). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (Third). California: Publications, Inc.
  4. FASB. (2006). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting: Objective of Financial Reporting and Qualitative Characteristics of Decision-Useful
  5. Demski, J. S. (2007). Is accounting an academic discipline? In Accounting Horizons, Vol. 21, pp. 153–157.
  6. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2007.21.2.153. Duffd, A. (2014). Learning styles and approaches in
  7. accounting education. In The Routledge Companion to Accounting Education, 163–188. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315889801
  8. Duff, A., & McKinstry, S. (2007). Students’ Approaches to Learning. Issues in Accounting Education,https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2007.22.2.183.
  9. Endraswara, S. (2010). Etika Hidup Orang Jawa: Pedoman Beretika dalam Menjalani Kehidupan Sehari-hari. Yogyakarta: Penerbit NARASI Retrieved from www.penerbitnarasi.blogspot.com
  10. FASB. (2006). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting: Objective of Financial Reporting and Qualitative Characteristics of Decision-Useful Financial Reporting Information.https://doi.org/http://www.fasb.org/j sp/FASB/Document_C/DocumentPage?cid=121 8220340119&acceptedDisclaimer=true.
  11. Fordham, D. R., & Hayes, D. C. (2009). Worth repeating: Paper Color May Have an Effect on Student Performance. Issues in Accounting Education, 24(2) 187–194.https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2009.24.2.187.
  12. Gani, L. (2018). Peran Akuntan Profesional dalam Revolusi Industri 4.0. Makalah Tantangan Kurikulum S1 Akuntansi dalam Era Industri 4.0. Direktorat Jenderal Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan Kementrian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi 07 Agustus. Banjarmasin.
  13. Ghozali, I., & Chariri, A. (2014). Teori Akuntansi International Financial Reporting System (IFRS) (Edisi 4). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro
  14. Goldwater, P. M., & Fogarty, T. J. (2007). Protecting the Solution: A “High-Tech.” Method to Guarantee Individual Effort in Accounting Classes. Accounting Education, 16(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280701234344.
  15. Kamdi, W. (2018). Pendidikan Tinggi 4.0. Opini Kompas. Sabtu 03 Maret.
  16. Lashine, S. H., & Mohamed, E. K. A. (2013). Accounting knowledge and skills and the challenges of a global business environment. Managerial Finance, 29(7), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350310768319.
  17. Livdan, D., & Nezlobin, A. (2017). Accounting rules, equity valuation, and growth options. Review of Accounting Studies, 22(3), 1122–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-017-9402-6.
  18. Mohamed, N. (2018). Revisiting Accountant’s Role inthe Disruption Era of Informasi Technology Advancement. Makalah dalam The 4th International Conference on Accounting and Finance, 25-26 April. Yogyakarta.
  19. Sarwiyono, R. (2017). Ki Ageng Suryomentaram Sang Plato dari Jawa (Cetakan I). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Cemerlang Publishing. Retrieved from http://solusibuku.com.
  20. Schöndube-Pirchegger, B., & Schöndube, J. R. (2017). Relevance Versus Reliability of Accounting Information with Unlimited and Limited Commitment. Business Research, 10(2), 189– 213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017-0050- 2.
  21. Sugiarto, R. (2015). Psikologi Raos: Saintifikasi Kawruh Jiwa Ki Ageng Suryomentaram. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Ifada. Retrieved from www.ifadabooks.com.
  22. Suwardjono. (2016). Teori Akuntansi Perekayasaan Pelaporan Keuangan. Edisi Ketiga. Yogyakarta: Penerbit BPFE.
  23. Suwignyo, A. (2012, September). Kunci Reformasi Pendidikan. Opini Kompas. Selasa 04 September.
  24. Tolle, E. (2014). The Power of Now. Edisi Revisi. (P. Rajoe, Ed.). Jakarta: Penerbit PT Bhuana Ilmu Populer.
  25. Warsono, S. (2010). Reformasi Akuntansi Membongkar Bounded Rationality Pengembangan Akuntansi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Asgard Chapter. Retrieved from www.cherrycorner.com.
  26. Warsono, S. (2011). Adopsi Standar Akuntansi IFRS: Fakta, Dilema Dan Matematika. (I. Natalia, Ed.). Yogyakarta: AB PublishER. Retrieved from akuntamatika@yahoo.com.