Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 324 Download : 297

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the depth of SME’s understanding towards accountability that embodied in the financial statements. This is important since the financial statements must be reported as part of accountability to external parties. This research was conducted based on qualitative method and phenomenological approach. The site of this research is an SME engaged in a fish trade. The results show that the SME has not realised the meaning and importance of accountability. This is due to simple bookeeping and financial reporting done by this SME, which is not in accordance with the applicable standard (SAK ETAP).


Abstrak


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pemahaman pelaku UMKM mengenai akuntabilitas yang diwujudkan dalam laporan keuangan. Pemahaman ini penting, mengingat laporan keuangan yang dihasilkan, harus dipertanggungjawabkan kepada pihak eksternal. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode kualitatif dan menggunakan pendekatan fenomenologi. UMKM yang menjadi situs penelitian adalah sebuah UMKM yang bergerak di bidang perdagangan ikan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaku UMKM belum memahami makna dan merasa pentingnya akuntabilitas. Hal ini disebabkan karena selama ini mereka hanya melakukan pembukuan dan pelaporan keuangan yang sederhana dan belum sesuai dengan standar yang berlaku yaitu SAK ETAP.

Keywords

Akuntabilitas Keuangan Perspektif UMKM

Article Details

License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Arnaboldi, M. and Azzone G. (2010). Constructing
  2. Performance Measurement in the Public Sector.
  3. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(4),
  4. -282.
  5. Bovens, M. (2010). Two Concepts of Accountability:
  6. Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism,
  7. West European Politics, 33(5), 946-967.
  8. Cieslewicz, J. K. (2014). Relationships Between
  9. National Economic Culture, Institutions, and Accounting: Implications for IFRS. Critical
  10. Perspectives on Accounting. 25(6), 511-528.
  11. Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry: Choosing
  12. among Five Traditions. London:Sage Publications.
  13. Dambrin, C., Lambert, C., & Sponem, S. (2007).
  14. Control and Change Analysing the Process of
  15. Institutionalization. Management Accounting
  16. Research. 18(2), 172-208.
  17. Ezzamel, M., Robson, K., Stapleton, P., & McLean,
  18. C. (2007). Discourse and Institutional Change:
  19. Giving Accounts and Accountability. Management
  20. Accounting Research. 18 (2), 150-171.
  21. Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting
  22. and Accountability: Changes and Challenges
  23. in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting.
  24. London: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  25. Subanar, Subanar. (2011). Management Usaha Kecil.
  26. Jogjakarta: BPFE.
  27. Ludigdo, Unti. (2005). Pemahaman Strukturasi atas
  28. Praktik Etika di sebuah Kantor Akuntan Publik.
  29. Ringkasan Disertasi, Program Pasca Sarjana
  30. Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
  31. Lukka, K. (2007). Management Accounting Change
  32. and Stability: Loosely Coupled Rules and Routines
  33. in Action. Management Accounting Research
  34. . 18(1), 76-101.
  35. Byrd, M. J., & Megginson, L. (2013). Small Business
  36. Management: an Entrepreneur’s Guidebook.
  37. (7th ed). Boston: McGrawHill.
  38. Nor-Aziah, A. K., & Scapens R. W. (2007).
  39. Corporatization and Accounting Change:The
  40. Role of Accounting and Accountants in a Malaysian
  41. Public Utility. Management Accounting
  42. Research. 18(June), 209-247.
  43. Pipan, T., & Czarniawska, B. (2010). How to Construct
  44. an Actor-Network: Management Accounting
  45. from Idea to Practice. Critical Perspectives
  46. on Accounting. 21(3), 243-251.
  47. Tsamenyi, M., Cullen, J., & Gonzalez, J. M. G.
  48. (2006). Changes in Accounting and Financial
  49. Information System in a Spanish Electricity
  50. Company: a New Institutional Theory Analysis.
  51. Management Accounting Research. 17(4),
  52. -432.
  53. Siregar. 2015. Pelaku UMKM Mulai Terhantam
  54. Perlambatan Ekonomi dan Pelemahan Rupiah.
  55. Diakses tanggal 31 Januari 2016 dari
  56. http://ekonomi.metrotvnews.com/read/2015/08/
  57. /161212/pelaku-umkm-mulai-terhantamperlambatan-
  58. ekonomi-pelemahan-rupiah.