Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate a knowledge base for the implementation of good corporate governance in SMEs sectorand identify a special governance provision that need to be addressed over the implementation of good corporate governance in the SME sector. Interviews were conducted on the 10 interviewees of owners and managers within SMEs in Malang, Batu, Sidoarjo, Jember, and Madiun East Java. The results show that the application of the governance aspects of SMEs may need to be adjusted regarding a difference legal forms of SMEs, among others, 3 (three) legal form of the business entity of the Corporation, Partnerships, and Sole Traders.Across these entities, monitoring and family governance mechanism requires more attention from decision-makers, investors, and banks as well as SMEs themselves. In order to implement an effective monitoring mechanism, the role of the Board of Commissioners and Board of Directors is in accordance the rules of the corporation. While partnership and sole traders need to set up an advisory board consisting of all partnerand to engage external consultants related accounting aspects. In addition, the sole traders with owner-manager should engage external consultant to have a second opinion during decision making process.


Abstrak


Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk melakukan investigasi dalam mengidentifikasi sebuah dasar pengetahuan (knowledge base) atas implementasi good corporate governance pada sektor UKM non-go public, dan mengidentifikasi aspek pengaturan yang perlu dimodifikasi atas implementasi good corporate governance pada sektor ini. Wawancara dilakukan kepada 10 informan pelaku UKM di wilayah Malang, Batu, Sidoarjo, Jember, dan, Madiun Propinsi Jawa Timur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam penerapan aspek good governance UKM dapat menyesuaikan dengan bentuk badan hukumnya, antara lain 3 (tiga) bentuk hukum badan usaha yakni perseroan, persekutuan, dan perseorangan. Dari aspek tersebut, mekanisme monitoring dan family governance memerlukan perhatian lebih dari pengambil keputusan, investor, dan perbankan serta para pelaku UKM sendiri. Dalam rangka menerapkan mekanisme monitoring yang efektif, peran dewan komisaris dan direksi mengikuti aturan tentang perseroan. Sementara persekutuan perlu membakukan adanya dewan penasehat yang mungkin terdiri dari seluruh sekutu/partners dan mempekerjakan konsultan eksternal utamanya terkait aspek akuntansi. Selanjutnya, pada perseorangan dengan owner-manager perlu mengoptimalkan adanya konsultan untuk mendapatkan alternatif pilihan dalam pengambilan keputusan.

Keywords

Corporate Governance SME companies Corporations Partnerships Sole traders

Article Details

References

  1. Abor, A.&Adjasi, C. K. D. (2007), Corporate Governance
  2. and the Small and Medium Enterprises
  3. Sector: Theory and Implications, Corporate
  4. Governance, 7(2), 111-122.
  5. Agyapong, D. (2010). Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises’
  6. Activities, Income Level andPover-ty
  7. Reduction in Ghana: A Synthesis of Related
  8. Literature, International Journal ofBusiness
  9. and Management, 5(12), 196-205.
  10. Ahmad, N. H., dan Seet, P. S. (2009). Dissecting
  11. Behaviours Associated with Business Failure:
  12. A Qualitative Study of SME Owners in Malaysia
  13. and Australia. Asian Social Science, 5
  14. (9), 98-104.
  15. Aina, Olayinka Chris Mnitp, RTP, Amnes. (2007).
  16. The Role of SMEs in Poverty Alleviation in
  17. Nigeria, Journal of Land Use and Development
  18. Studies, 3(1), 124-131.
  19. BAPEPAM-LK. (2011). Potensi Perusahaan UKM
  20. untuk Go Publik. Jakarta: Departemen Keuangan
  21. Republik Indonesia.
  22. Clarke, A. D. (2007). Corporate Governance and
  23. SMEs: The Forgotten Stakeholders.Australian
  24. Business Law Review, 35(1), 7-17.
  25. Dubai SME. (2011). The Code of Corporate Governance
  26. for Small and Medium Enterprises.
  27. Dube, I. 2011. Corporate Governance Norm for SME. Journal for Public Administration and Governance,
  28. (2), 77-123.
  29. Flowers, D., Parker, H., Arenz, J., Gaffley, J.,
  30. Greighton, L., Fredricks, L., Rasdicn, S.,
  31. Matthews, T., Pietersen, V., dan Smit, Y. 2013.
  32. An Explanatory Study on Corporation Governance
  33. Practises in Small and Micro Fast Moving
  34. Consumer Good enterprises in the Cape
  35. Metropole. African Journal of Business Management.
  36. (22), 2119-2125.
  37. Iorpev, L. (2012). Does Bank Size Master to Small
  38. and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs) Financing
  39. in Negeria? International Journal of Business
  40. and Management Tommorrow, 2(3), 19.
  41. Jaswadi, Iqbal M., Sumiadji. (2014). Norm of SME
  42. Corporate Governance: A Need for Specific
  43. Guideline Development. Artikel dipresentasikan
  44. di The 1st Indonesian Finance Association
  45. (IFA) Conference, Solo-Indonesia, 14-15 Januari
  46. Jaswadi, Iqbal, M., Sumiadji (2015). SME Governance
  47. in Indonesia: a Survey and Insight from
  48. Private Companies. Procedia Finance and Economics
  49. Journal 31. 387-398, available online
  50. at www.sciencedirect.com, doi:
  51. 1016/S2212-5671(15)01214-9.
  52. Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance (KNKG)
  53. (2006). Pedoman Umum Good Corporate Governance
  54. Indonesia.
  55. Krechovzka, M., & Prochazkova, P. T. 2014. Sustainability
  56. and Its Integration into Corporate
  57. Governance Focusing on Corporate Performance
  58. Management and Reporting, Procedia
  59. Engineering, 69(2014), 1144-1151.
  60. Li, S. & Ghuliang Luo, (2008). Growth Pattern,
  61. Employment and Income Inequality: What
  62. the Experience of Republic of Korea and Taipie,
  63. China Reveals to the People’s Republic
  64. ofChina, Asian Development Review, 25(1&2),
  65. -118.
  66. Marsch, K., Schmieder, C., & Aerssen , K.F.2007.
  67. Banking Consolidation and Small Business
  68. Finance Empirical Evidence from Germany.
  69. Discussion Paper, Series 2. Banking and Finance
  70. StudiesNo. 09.
  71. Medco (2005). Profil Medco Energi: Providing Energy
  72. for Life. Jakarta.
  73. Obamuyi, T. M. 2010. Firms’ Performance and Lending
  74. Constraints in Nigeria. Journal of Entrepreneurship.
  75. (2), 179-190.
  76. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
  77. (OECD). 2006. Corporate Governance
  78. of Non-Listed Companies in Emerging Market.
  79. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK).2015. Peraturan OJK
  80. No. 04/POJK.03/2015 tentang
  81. PenerapanTata Kelola bagi Bank
  82. Perkreditan Rakyat.
  83. Ramakrishnan, R. 2013. SMEs: The Smart Enterprises.
  84. Working Paper.
  85. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2324874.
  86. Sener, S., Savrul, M., dan Aydin, O. 2014. Structure
  87. of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in
  88. Turkey and Global Competitiveness Strategies.
  89. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences.
  90. Vol 150, 212-221.
  91. Sharma, P. (2004). An Overview of the Field of Family
  92. Business Studies: Current Status and Directions
  93. for the Future. Family Business Review,
  94. (1), 1-36.
  95. Tambunan, T. (2005). Promoting Small and Medium
  96. Enterprises with a Clustering Approach: A
  97. Policy Experience from Indonesia. Journal of
  98. Small Business Management, 43(2), 138-154.
  99. Tambunan, T. 2008. SME Development, Economic
  100. Growth, and Government Intervention in a
  101. Developing Country: The Indonesian Story.
  102. Journal of International Entrepreneurship,
  103. (4), 147-167.
  104. Umrani, A. I., Johl, S. K. dan Ibrahim, M. Y. 2015.
  105. Corporate Governance Practices and Problems
  106. Faced by SMEs in Malaysia. Global
  107. Business and Management Research: An International
  108. Journal, 7(2), 71-77.
  109. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun
  110. tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah.
  111. Wahab, E. A. A., How, J. C. Y. dan Verhoeven, P.
  112. The Impact of the Malaysian Code on
  113. Corporate Governance: Compliance, Institutional
  114. Investors, and Stock Performance.
  115. Journal of Contemporary Accountingand
  116. Economics, 3(2), 106 -129.