Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 98 Download : 86

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The aims of this research was to conduct a developmnet research model to design an Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) at Rayanet Surabaya. This research uses the model of Borg and Gall (1983). The research phase starting from problem identification, data collection, arranging of the product, and expert validation test. The data collection technique useobservation, interviews, and questionnaires. Questionnaire as an instrument of expert validation consists of four measurement aspects such as usability, convenience, completeness, and legibility. The technique used to analyze the data is the average value analysis. The results of this study was 21 Financial Management SOP and 20 Operational Services SOP. Based on testing by two validators expert, the product is considered to have a level of usability, convenience, completeness, and high readability.


Abstrak


Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menghasilkan sistem mutu berbentuk Standar Operasional Prosedur (SOP) di Rayanet Surabaya. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan model penelitian pengembangan Borg dan Gall (1983). Tahap penelitian dimulai dari identifikasi masalah, pengumpulan data, penyusunan produk, dan uji validasi ahli. Teknik pengumpulan data yaitu observasi (pengamatan), interview (wawancara), dan kuisioner (angket). Angket sebagai instrumen validasi ahli terdiri dari 4 aspek penilaian, yaitu aspek kegunaan, kemudahan, kelengkapan, dan keterbacaan. Teknik yang digunakan untuk menganalisis data hasil skoring validasi adalah dengan menggunakan nilai rata-rata. Penelitian ini menghasilkan 21 SOP Pengelolaan Keuangan dan 20 SOP Pelayanan.Validasi ahli menyatakan SOP mempunyai tingkat kegunaan, kemudahan, kelengkapan, dan keterbacaan yang tinggi.

Keywords

Quality system SOP Finance Services

Article Details

License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Amirya, M., Djamhuri, A. & Ludigdo, U. 2012. Jurnal
  2. Akuntansi Multiparadigma,3(3), 343-356.
  3. Atilgan, E., Akinci, S. & Aksoy, S. 2003. Mapping
  4. Service Quality in the Tourism Industry. Managing
  5. Service Quality, 13(5), 415-422.
  6. Atmoko, T. 2012. Standar Operasional Prosedur
  7. (SOP) dan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah.
  8. Skripsi. Universitas Padjajaran. Bandung.
  9. Bamigboye, O.B. 2007. Evaluation of Library Services
  10. Delivery in Olabisi Onabanjo University,
  11. Ago-Iwoye, Nigeria. Library Management.
  12. ,152-162.
  13. Borg. W.R. & Gall, M.D. 1983. Educational Research:
  14. An Introduction. Longman: New York.
  15. Broderick, A.J. & Vachirapornpuk, S. 2002. Service
  16. Quality in Internet Banking: The importance of
  17. Customer Role. Marketing Intelligence & Planning.
  18. (6),327-335.
  19. Carruthers, B. G. 1995. Accounting, Ambiguity, and
  20. the New Institutionalism.Accounting, Organizational
  21. andSociety, 20(4), 313-328.
  22. Daft, R. 2012. Era Baru Manajemen. Salemba Empat:
  23. Jakarta.
  24. Hill, F.M. 1995. Managing Service Quality in Higher
  25. Education: The Role of the Student as Primary
  26. Consumer. Quality Assurance in Education.
  27. (3), 10-21.
  28. Idris, F., Fun, C. S., & Ramli, N.B. 2009. Kajian
  29. Kepuasan Pelanggan terhadap Perkhidmatan
  30. Perpustakaan Universiti Awam di Malaysia.
  31. Jurnal Pengurusan, 28, 23-43.
  32. Joint, N. 2005. Evaluating the Quality of Library
  33. Portals. Library Review.54, 337-341.
  34. Kayaman, R. & Arasli, H. 2007. Customer Based
  35. Brand Equity: Evidence from the Hotel Industry.
  36. Managing Service Quality, 17(1), 92-109.
  37. Kotler, K. 2009. Manajemen Pemasaran 1. Edisi
  38. Ketigabelas. Erlangga : Jakarta.
  39. Lagrosen, S. dan Lagrosen, Y. 2003. Management of
  40. Service Quality – Differences in Values, Practices
  41. and Outcomes. Managing Service Quality.
  42. (5), 370-381.
  43. Leisen, B. dan Vance, C. 2001. Cross-National
  44. Assessment of Service Quality in the Telecommunication
  45. Industry: Evidence from USA
  46. and Germany. Managing Service Quality.
  47. (5), 307-317.
  48. Lupiyoadi, R. 2014. Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa.
  49. Salemba Empat: Jakarta.
  50. Miao, H. dan Bassham, M.W. 2006. Embracing Customer
  51. Service in Libraries. Library Management,
  52. , 53-61.
  53. Mira, L.M., Gehld J., Sersa, G., Collins, C.G., Garbay,
  54. J.R., Billard, V., Geertsen, P.F., Rudolf, Z.,
  55. O’sullifan, G.C., dan Martya, M. 2006.
  56. Standard Operating Procedures of the
  57. Electrochemotherapy: Instructions for the Use
  58. of Bleomycin or Cisplatin Administered Either Systemically or Locally and Electric Pulses
  59. Delivered by the Cliniporatortm by Means of
  60. Invasive or Non-Invasive Electrodes. EJC Supplements,
  61. , 14-25.
  62. Mulyadi. 2016. Sistem Akuntansi. Cetakan ke-4 Edisi
  63. Salemba Empat: Jakarta.
  64. Arasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. dan Berry, L.L.
  65. (1988), SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale
  66. for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service
  67. Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-
  68. Prasanna. 2013. Standard Operating Procedures for
  69. Standalone Hotels. Research Journal of Management
  70. Science, 2(7), 1-9.
  71. Roslah Johari dan A.N. Zainab. 2007. Identifying
  72. What Services Need to be Improved by
  73. Measuring the Library’s Performance. Malaysian
  74. Journal of Library & Information Science,
  75. (1), 35-53.
  76. Rhoades, D.L. dan Blaise W. Jr. B. 2008. Twenty
  77. Years of Service Quality Performance in the
  78. US Airline Industry. Managing Service Quality,
  79. (1), 20-33.
  80. Ritchie, L. 2002. Driving quality – clinical governance
  81. in the National Health Service. Managing
  82. Service Quality, 12(2): 117-128.
  83. Sartono, A. 2008. Manajemen Keuangan, Teori dan
  84. Aplikasi. BPFE-Yogyakarta.
  85. Setiawati, W. 2015. Penyusunan Standard Operating
  86. Procedures (SOP) pada PT. Sketsa Cipta Graha
  87. di Surabaya. Agora, 3(1), 514-522.
  88. Snoj, B dan Petermanec, Z. 2001. Let Users Judge the
  89. Quality of Faculty Library Services. New Library
  90. World, 102(9), 314-324.
  91. Spathis, C., Petridou, E. dan Glaveli, N. 2004. Managing
  92. Quality Service in Banks: Customers’
  93. Gender Effects. Managing Service Quality.
  94. (1), 90-102.
  95. Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan
  96. Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D.
  97. Alfabeta : Bandung.
  98. Susanti, C.E. 2009. TQM dan ISO 9000:2000 dalam
  99. Pelayanan Kesehatan VS Malcom Baldrige
  100. National Quality Award (MBNQA). In the 3rd
  101. National Conference Faculty of Economics Towards
  102. a New Business Architecture, October,
  103. , 2009, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala
  104. Surabaya.