Article Sidebar

Download
Statistic
Read Counter : 10

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract





Abstrak: Signifikansi Karakteristik Chief Financial Officer dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan


Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji efektivitas teori fraud pentagon dalam mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan dengan karakteristik CFO sebagai variabel moderasi.


Metode: Sampel yang digunakan terdiri dari 17 perusahaan fraud yang merupakan perusahaan yang terkena sanksi OJK atas pelanggaran penyajian laporan keuangan, dan 17 perusahaan non-fraud sebagai pembanding. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi logistik dan regresi moderating.


Hasil: Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa secara statistik variabel stabilitas keuangan, ineffective monitoring, dan auditor switching berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kemungkinan kecurangan laporan keuangan. Selain itu, karakteristik CFO dapat meningkatkan hubungan antara stabilitas keuangan, pemantauan yang tidak efektif, pergantian auditor, pergantian direktur hingga kecurangan laporan keuangan.


Kebaruan: Penelitian ini menguji deteksi kecurangan pelaporan keuangan dengan menambahkan karakteristik CFO yang terdiri dari umur, gender, pendidikan, dan tenur auditor sebagai variabel moderasi dimana belum pernah dilakukan sebelumnya.


Kontribusi: Penelitian ini dapat digunakan oleh investor dalam mengambil keputusan berinvestasi dan pertimbangan bagi pihak manajemen dalam memahami karakteristik penyajian laporan keuangan guna mencegah tindakan fraud dan serta meningkatkan nilai perusahaan.


 


Abstract: The Significance of Chief Financial Officer Characteristics in Detecting Financial Statement Fraud


Objective: This study aims to test the effectiveness of the pentagon fraud theory in detecting fraudulent financial statements with CFO characteristics as a moderating variable.


Method: The sample used consisted of 17 fraud companies, which were companies that were subject to OJK sanctions for violations of financial report presentation, and 17 non-fraud companies as a comparison. Data analysis in this study used logistic regression analysis and moderated regression.


Results: The results of this study show that statistically the variables financial stability, ineffective monitoring, and auditor switching have a significant effect on the possibility of fraudulent financial statements. In addition, CFO characteristics can increase the relationship between financial stability, ineffective monitoring, changing auditors, changing directors and financial statement fraud.


Novelty: This research tests the detection of fraudulent financial reporting by adding CFO characteristics consisting of age, gender, education and auditor tenure as moderating variables which has never been done before.


Contribution: This research can be used by investors in making investment decisions and considerations for management in understanding the characteristics of financial report presentation in order to prevent fraud and increase company value.





Keywords

Chief Financial Officer Kecurangan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Fraud Pentagon

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Jaswadi, Dicky Chandra Ardiansah, Anin Dyah Luthfiani

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. T. L. D. Huynh, J. Wu, and A. T. Duong, “Information Asymmetry and Firm Value: Is Vietnam Different?,” J. Econ. Asymmetries, vol. 21, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jeca.2019.e00147.
  2. S. Worokinasih and M. L. Z. B. M. Zaini, “The mediating role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure on good corporate governance (GCG) and firm value,” Australas. Accounting, Bus. Financ. J., vol. 14, no. 1 Special Issue, pp. 88–96, 2020, doi: 10.14453/aabfj.v14i1.9.
  3. J. J. Weygandt, P. D. Kimmel, and D. E. Kieso, Accounting Principles, 13th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2018.
  4. M. B. Romney and P. J. Steinbart, Accounting Information System, 14th ed. New York: Pearson, 2018.
  5. ACFE, “Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse: 2020 Global Fraud Study,” ACFE, Inc., Austin, Texas, 2020.
  6. T. Motsoeneng and E. Rumney, “PwC investigation finds $7.4 billion accounting fraud at Steinhoff, company says,” Reuters, Mar. 2019.
  7. CNN Indonesia, “Kronologi Kisruh Laporan Keuangan Garuda Indonesia,” Apr. 2019.
  8. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, “Siaran Pers: Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Berikan Sanksi Kasus PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero),” Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 2019. https://ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/siaran-pers/Pages/Siaran-Pers--Otoritas-Jasa-Keuangan-Berikan-Sanksi-Kasus-Pt-Garuda-Indonesia-Persero-Tbk.aspx
  9. D. T. Wolfe and D. R. Hermanson, “The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud,” CPA J., vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 38–42, 2004.
  10. Crowe Horwarth, “IIA Practice Guide: Fraud and Internal Audit,” West. Reg. Conf., pp. 1–49, 2011.
  11. C. Tessa and P. Harto, “Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Pada Sektor Keuangan Dan Perbankan Di Indonesia,” Simp. Nas. Akunt. XIX, Lampung, pp. 1–21, 2016.
  12. K. S. Sihombing and S. N. Rahardjo, “Analisis Fraud Diamond Dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud: Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Tahun 2010-2012,” Diponegoro J. Account., vol. 03, pp. 1–12, 2014.
  13. M. Ulfah, E. Nuraina, and A. L. Wijaya, “Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Studi Empiris Pada Perbankan Di Indonesia Yang Terdaftar Di Bei,” Forum Ilm. Pendidik. Akunt., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 399–418, 2017.
  14. T. P. Sari and D. I. T. Lestari, “Analisis Faktor Risiko Yang Mempengaruhi Financial Statement Fraud: Prespektif Diamond Fraud Theory,” J. Akunt. dan Pajak, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 109–125, 2020, doi: 10.29040/jap.v20i2.618.
  15. Y. Septriyani and D. Handayani, “Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon,” J. Akuntansi, Keuang. dan Bisnis, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 11–23, 2018.
  16. S. Prasmaulida, “Financial Statement Fraud Detection Using Perspective of Fraud Triangle Adopted By Sas No. 99,” Asia Pacific Fraud J., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 317, 2016, doi: 10.21532/apfj.001.16.01.02.24.
  17. N. Christian and Julyanti, “Analisis teori fraud pentagon dalam mendeteksi fraudulent financial report pada perusahaan terdaftar di BEI tahun 2015-2019,” Comb. - Conf. Manag. Business, Innov. Educ. Soc. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1426–1435, 2021.
  18. R. D. Agustina and D. Pratomo, “Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan,” J. Ilm. Manajemen, Ekon. Akunt., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 44–62, 2019, doi: 10.31955/mea.vol3.iss1.pp44-62.
  19. K. L. S. Devy, M. A. Wahyuni, and N. L. G. Sulidawati, “Pengaruh Frequent Number Of Ceo’s Picture, Pergantian Direksi Perusahaan dan External Pressure Dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Studi empiris pada perusahaan farmasi yang listing di BEI periode 2012-2016 ),” e-journal S1 Ak Univ. Pendidik. Ganesha, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2017.
  20. S. Apriliana and L. Agustina, “The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach,” J. Din. Akunt., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 154–165, 2017, doi: 10.15294/jda.v7i1.4036.
  21. A. P. N. Haqq and G. S. Budiwitjaksono, “Fraud Pentagon for Detecting Financial Statement Fraud,” J. Econ. Business, Account. Ventur., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 319–332, 2020, doi: 10.14414/jebav.v22i3.1788.
  22. P. Jiraporn, M. Singh, and C. I. Lee, “Ineffective corporate governance: Director busyness and board committee memberships,” J. Bank. Financ., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 819–828, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.09.020.
  23. C. Troy, K. G. Smith, and M. A. Domino, “CEO demographics and Accounting Fraud: Who is More Likely To Rationalize Illegal Acts?,” Strateg. Organ., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 259–282, 2011, doi: 10.1177/1476127011421534.
  24. J. Sun, P. Kent, B. Qi, and J. Wang, “Chief Financial Officer Demographic Characteristics and Fraudulent Financial Reporting in China,” Account. Financ., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 2705–2734, 2019, doi: 10.1111/acfi.12286.
  25. P. Papadimitri, F. Pasiouras, M. Tasiou, and A. Ventouri, “The effects of board of directors’ education on firms’ credit ratings,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 116, no. 462, pp. 294–313, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.059.
  26. A. Aprilia, “Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Beneish Model Pada Perusahaan yang Menerapkan Asean Corporate Governance Scorecard,” J. ASET (Akuntansi Riset), vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 101–132, 2017.
  27. J. Marks, “The Mind Behind the Fraudsters Crime: Key Behavioral and Environmental Elements,” Horwath, Crowe, vol. 94, no. 8, p. 14, 2012.
  28. H. Agusputri and S. Sofie, “Faktor - Faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Dengan Menggunakan Analisis Fraud Pentagon,” J. Informasi, Perpajakan, Akuntansi, Dan Keuang. Publik, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 105, 2019, doi: 10.25105/jipak.v14i2.5049.
  29. S.Tri Nanda, N. Salmiah, and D. Mulyana, “Fraudulent Financial Reporting: a Pentagon Fraud Analysis,” J. Ilm. Ekon. Dan Bisnis, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 122–134, 2019, doi: 10.31849/jieb.v16i2.2678.
  30. L. Tiffani and Marfuah, “Deteksi Financial Statement Fraud dengan Analisis Fraud Triangel pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia,” J. Akunt. dan Audit. Indones., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 112–125, 2015.
  31. K. Larum, D. Zuhroh, and E. Subiyantoro, “Fraudulent Financial Reporting : Menguji Potensi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan dengan Menggunakan Teori Fraud Hexagon,” Account. Financ. Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 82–94, 2021.
  32. N. Sasongko and S. F. Wijayantika, “Faktor Resiko Fraud Terhadap Pelaksanaan Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Berdasarkan Pendekatan Crown’s Fraud Pentagon Theory),” Ris. Akunt. dan Keuang. Indones., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2019, doi: 10.23917/reaksi.v4i1.7809.
  33. M. K. Yusof, A. A. H. Khair, and J. Simon, “The Macrotheme Review,” Macrothem Rev. A Multidiscip. J. Glob. Macro Trends, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 126–145, 2015.
  34. D. Hambrick and P. Mason, “Upper Echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers,” Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 193–206, 1984, [Online]. Available: 10.5465/AMR.1984.4277628%0Ahttp://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx%3Fdirect%3Dtrue%26db%3Dbth%26AN%3D4277628%26site%3Deds-live&group=trial
  35. J. Jaswadi, H. Purnomo, and S. Sumiadji, “Financial Statement Fraud In Indonesia: A Longitudinal Study Of Financial Misstatement In The Pre- And Post-Establishment Of Financial Services Authority,” J. Financ. Report. Account., 2022, doi: 10.1108/jfra-10-2021-0336.
  36. P. M. Dechow, W. Ge, C. R. Larson, and R. G. Sloan, “Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements,” Contemp. Account. Res., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 17–82, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x.
  37. F. Quraini and Y. Rimawati, “Determinan Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using Fraud Pentagon Analysis,” J. Audit. Financ. Forensic Account., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 105–114, 2019, doi: 10.21107/jaffa.v6i2.4938.
  38. E. Hidayah and G. D. Saptarini, “Pentagon Fraud Analysis in Detecting Potential Financial Statement Fraud of Banking Companies in Indonesia,” Int. Conf. Acoounting, Business, Econ., no. 2010, pp. 89–102, 2019.