Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 601 Download : 255

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract: Tri-Silas Values- Based Accounting Education
Purpose: This research aims to offer a concept of accounting education that is Indonesianized based on the Sundanese Tri-Silas culture.
Method: The value of local wisdom of the Sundanese community (Tri-Silas) is revealed by qualitative research methods in the frame of the archipelago paradigm.
Results: A wise accounting education is an accounting education that departs from the values of Tri-Silas, Silih Asih which forms a compassionate education pattern. Silih Asuh with an education pattern that prioritizes togetherness in honing knowledge so as to create a healthy and nurturing learning pattern. Silih Asuh encourages the development of self-consciousness to establish good relationships and maintain the rights and obligations of others.
Novelty: This research departs from the researcher's self-awareness about the importance of embracing accounting education in accordance with the noble values of Urang Sunda Culture.
Contribution: Tri-Silas values will eventually be able to suppress the egoistic (self-interest), materialistic, and godless (atheistic) nature of conventional accounting education patterns.


Abstrak: Pendidikan Akuntansi Berbasis Nilai Tri-Silas
Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menawarkan konsep  pendidikan akuntansi yang ke-Indonesia-an berbasis budaya Sunda Tri-Silas.
Metode: Nilai kearifan lokal masyarakat Sunda (Tri-Silas) diungkap dengan metode penelitian kualitatif dalam bingkai paradigma nusantara.
Hasil: Pendidikan akuntansi yang arif adalah pendidikan akuntansi yang berangkat dari nilai-nilai Tri-Silas, Silih Asih yang membentuk pola Pendidikan yang berwelas asih. Silih Asuh dengan pola Pendidikan yang mengedepankan kebersamaan dalam mengasah pengetahuan sehingga terciptanya pola pembelajaran yang sehat dan saling mengayomi. Silih Asuh mendorong perkembangan kesadaran diri (self-consciousness) untuk menjalin hubungan baik dan menjaga hak serta kewajiban orang lain.
Kebaruan: Penelitian ini berangkat dari kesadaran diri peneliti tentang pentingnya merangkul pendidikan akuntansi yang sesuai dengan nilai-nilai luhur Budaya Urang Sunda.
Kontribusi: Nilai Tri-Silas akhirnya akan mampu menekan sifat egoistik (self-interest), materialistik, dan tidak berketuhanan (ateistik) dari pola Pendidikan akuntansi yang konvensional.

Keywords

Accounting Silih Asah Silih Asih Silih Asuh Tri-Silas

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Anggie Wiyana Putri, Krisno Septyan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Rosala D, Masunah J, Narawati T, Karyono T, Sunaryo A. Internalisasi Nilai Tri-Silas melalui Pembelajaran Tari Anak Berbasis Budaya Lokal. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini 2021;5:1973–86. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i2.1087.
  2. Suissa J. Character education and the disappearance of the political. Ethics and Education 2015;10:105–17. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17449642.2014.998030.
  3. Hines RD. Accounting: Filling the negative space. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1992;17:313–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90027-P.
  4. Wyness L, Dalton F. The value of problem-based learning in learning for sustainability: Undergraduate accounting student perspectives. Journal of Accounting Education 2018;45:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2018.09.001.
  5. Septyan K, Mintoyuwono D. Meretas Praktik Pendidikan Akuntansi yang Bela Negara. Jurnal Riset Dan Aplikasi: Akuntansi Dan Manajemen 2023;6:293–308. https://doi.org/10.33795/jraam.v6i3.003
  6. Dellaportas S. Reclaiming ‘Sense’ from ‘Cents’ in Accounting Education. Accounting Education 2015;24:445–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2015.1114456.
  7. Sukoharsono EG. Metamorfosis Akuntansi Sosial Dan Lingkungan : Mengkonstruksi Akuntansi Sustainabilitas 2010:1–38.
  8. Mulawarman AD. Pendidikan Akuntansi Berbasis Cinta:Lepas dari Hegemoni Korporasi Menuju Pendidikan yang Memberdayakan dan Konsepsi Pembelajaran Yang Melampaui. Ekuitas (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan) 2008;12:142. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2008.v12.i2.2066.
  9. Setiowati NE. Muatan Etika Dan Mentalitas Pada Kurikulum Pendidikan Akuntansi. Edueksos: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Ekonomi 2016;1:1–15.
  10. Wahyuni AS, Chariri A. Building Critical Awareness of Accounting Students: A Transformative Learning Process. Dinamika Pendidikan 2019;14:127–41. https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v14i2.22462
  11. Singleton-Green B. The communication gap: Why doesn’t accounting research make a greater contribution to debates on accounting policy? Accounting in Europe 2010;7:129–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2010.511880.
  12. Mulawarman AD. Integrasi Paradigma Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 2010;Vol. 1.
  13. Morgan G. Accounting As Reality Construction: Towards A New Epistemology For Accounting Practice. Accounting Organizations and Society 1988;13:477–85.
  14. Mulawarman AD. Nyanyian Metodologi Akuntansi ala Nataatmadja: Melampaui Derridian Mengembangkan Pemikiran Bangsa “Sendiri.” Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma 2013;4. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2013.04.7189.
  15. Gray SJ. Hacia una Teoría de la Influencia Cultural en el Desarrollo de los Sistemas de Contabilidad Internacionalmente. Abacus 1988;24:1–15.
  16. Efferin S. Akuntansi, Spritualitas dan Kearifan Lokal Beberapa Agenda Penelitian Kritis. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma 2015;6:466–80. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2015.12.6037.
  17. Kamayanti A. Fobi(A)Kuntansi: Puisisasi Dan Refleksi Hakikat. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma 2016;7. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2016.04.7001.
  18. Tweedie J. The emancipatory potential of counter accounting: A Žižekian critique. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2023;95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102505.
  19. Handayati P, Alhaleh SEA. The Challenges and Prospect of Qualitative Research in Accounting. Proceedings of the 7th Regional Accounting Conference (KRA 2020) 2021;173:264–9. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210416.034.
  20. Gendron MP and Y. Qualitative research in auditing: A methodological roadmap. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (2015) 34 (2): 147–165 2015:1–23.
  21. Tweedie D, Hazelton J. Social Accounting for Inequality: Applying Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal 2015;35:113–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2015.1062788.
  22. Guo J, Dong X. The Cambridge handbook of intercultural pragmatics. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2023.2213498.
  23. Kosasih D. Promoting Peace Values in Sundanese Idioms: An effort for conflict resolution 2019;257:386–9. https://doi.org/10.2991/icollite-18.2019.85.
  24. Markus HR, Cross S, Fiske A, Gilligan C, Givon T, Kanagawa C, et al. Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychol Rev 1991;98:224–53.
  25. Tjeppy. Manajemen Pendidikan Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Budaya Sunda (Analisis Makna Silih Asah , Silih Asih dan Silih Asuh ) 2021;9:439–45.
  26. Saleh F, - S, - L. Makna “Silas” Menurut Kearifan Budaya Sunda Perspektif Filsafat Nilai: Relevansinya Bagi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Miskin. Sosiohumaniora 2013;15:178. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v15i2.5745.
  27. Deci EL, Olafsen AH, Ryan RM. Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations: The State of a Science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 2017;4:19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108.
  28. Alam A. Mapping a Sustainable Future Through Conceptualization of Transformative Learning Framework, Education for Sustainable Development, Critical Reflection, and Responsible Citizenship: An Exploration of Pedagogies for Twenty-First Century Learning. ECS Trans 2022;107:9827–40. https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.9827ecst.
  29. Mezirow J. Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 1997;1997:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401.
  30. Saravanamuthu K. Instilling a sustainability ethos in accounting education through the Transformative Learning pedagogy: A case-study. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2015;32:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.05.008.
  31. Mezirow J. Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: a guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. Interpreting 1987:214–6.
  32. Ali S, Khaleque A, Rohner RP. Influence of Perceived Teacher Acceptance and Parental Acceptance on Youth’s Psychological Adjustment and School Conduct: A Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis. Cross-Cultural Research 2015;49:204–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397114552769.
  33. Takdir Muh, Sumarto S, Komariah A, Suryana A. SILAS-Based Approach in Practice of Education: The Mission of Peace and Humanity 2020;400:228–31. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200130.172.
  34. Dounis V. Building Positive Teacher Relationships with Students. Quality Learning 2017:79–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-914-0_8.