Main Article Content

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi dan infrastruktur ternyata dapat mempengaruhi sistem pendekatan manajemen konstruksi yang digunakan di berbagai negara. Sejalan dengan hal tersebut, masih banyak ditemui proyek konstruksi dengan manajemen konvensional yang mengalami pemborosan, kerugian, kegagalan, sampai kesenjangan. Beberapa ahli dan organisasi mencoba mencari solusi dari permasalahan tersebut dengan mentransformasi industri konstruksi untuk menciptakan tim proyek yang terintegrasi dan kolaboratif, hasilnya dalam dekade terakhir penerapan pendekatan IPD (Integrated project delivery) sebagai salah satu pendekatan yang kian diminati oleh beberapa benua seperti Amerika, Eropa Dan Asia. Terbaru, banyak penelitian yang menggambarkan pendekatan IPD dinilai berhasil bertahan ketika pandemi Covid-19. Selain itu, pendekatan IPD mulai diadopsi ke dalam tujuan ke-17 pembangunan berkelanjutan (SDGs) tentang kemitraan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi bentuk sistem integrasi dalam mencapai keberhasilan dari beberapa pelaksanaan manajemen proyek dengan menggunakan metode literature review. Hasilnya adalah banyak ditemukan beberapa bentuk kemitraan, kolaborasi dalam penggunaan pendekatan terintegrasi yang diharapkan dapat memberikan wawasan terutama kepada praktisi dan pemangku kepentingan kemitraan dalam manajemen proyek.

Keywords

Integrasi Integrated Project Delivery Kolaboratif Kemitraan

Article Details

References

  1. E. M. Sari et al., “Challenge and Awareness for Implemented Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) in Indonesian Projects,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 1, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/buildings13010262.
  2. H. Ashcraft, “Transforming project delivery: integrated project delivery,” Oxf Rev Econ Policy, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 369–384, 2022, doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grac001.
  3. M. Sherif, I. Abotaleb, and F. K. Alqahtani, “Application of Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) in the Middle East: Implementation and Challenges,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 4, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12040467.
  4. S. B. Paulsen, A. Engebø, and O. Lædre, “STRATEGIC PARTNERING BETWEEN CONTRACTORS AND DESIGNERS,” in 30th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, IGLC 2022, The International Group for Lean Construction, 2022, pp. 330–341. doi: 10.24928/2022/0134.
  5. S. Rashidian, R. Drogemuller, and S. Omrani, “Building Information Modelling, Integrated Project Delivery, and Lean Construction Maturity Attributes: A Delphi Study,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 2, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/buildings13020281.
  6. W. Fei et al., “The critical role of the construction industry in achieving the sustainable development goals (Sdgs): Delivering projects for the common good,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 16, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13169112.
  7. AIACC. “INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY- AN UPDATED WORKING DEFINITION”. 2014.
  8. Z. Kahvandi, E. Saghatforoush, A. Z. Ravasan, and M. L. Viana, “A Review and Classification of Integrated Project Delivery Implementation Enablers,” Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 219–236, 2020, doi: 10.21315/jcdc2020.25.2.9.
  9. M. S. Bajjou and A. Chafi, “The potential effectiveness of lean construction principles in reducing construction process waste: An input-output model,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, vol. 12, pp. 4141–4160, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.15282/jmes.12.4.2018.12.0358.
  10. Y. Zhang and H. Hu, “UTILIZATION OF A COGNITIVE TASK ANALYSIS FOR INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY APPLICATION: CASE STUDY OF CONSTRUCTING A CAMPUS UNDERGROUND PARKING FACILITY,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/
  11. C. M. Eastman, BIM handbook : a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors. Wiley, 2008.
  12. A. Montaser and O. Moselhi, “METHODOLOGY FOR AUTOMATED GENERATION OF 4D BIM.”
  13. “Industry Agenda Shaping the Future of Construction A Breakthrough in Mindset and Technology Prepared in collaboration with The Boston Consulting Group,” 2016.
  14. S. Banihashemi, S. Khalili, M. Sheikhkhoshkar, and A. Fazeli, “Machine learning-integrated 5D BIM informatics: building materials costs data classification and prototype development,” Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, vol. 7, no. 3, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s41062-022-00822-y.
  15. Q. Lu, J. Won, and J. C. P. Cheng, “A financial decision making framework for construction projects based on 5D Building Information Modeling (BIM),” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 3–21, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.09.004.
  16. “IPD: Performance, Expectations, and Future Use A Report On Outcomes of a University of Minnesota Survey,” 2015.