Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: investigates how media exposure, green innovation, and corporate governance influence corporate greenwashing.


Method: The study employs regression analysis using a sample of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2018 to 2023.


Results: both media exposure and green innovation have a statistically significant positive effect on greenwashing. In contrast, profitability and board size are negatively associated with greenwashing and the presence of women on the board have a positive and significant influence on greenwashing.


Novelty: this study offers a novel contribution by simultaneously examining both external drivers and internal drivers in shaping greenwashing.


Contribution: this study illustrates the application of signalling theory and legitimacy theory by demonstrating that firms pursue external legitimacy, particularly through media exposure and green innovation-related disclosures.


Abstrak: Hijau atau Sekadar Pencitraan?: Menelusuri Praktik Greenwashing Melalui Perspektif Media, Inovasi, dan Tata Kelola


Tujuan: penelitian ini menginvestigasi bagaimana media, inovasi hijau, dan tata kelola perusahaan memengaruhi praktik greenwashing.


Metode: penelitian menggunakan analisis regresi dimana sampel pada penelitian adalah perusahaan yang terdaftar di IDX selama periode 2018–2023.


Hasil: media dan inovasi hijau berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap greenwashing. Sebaliknya, profitabilitas dan ukuran dewan direksi berpengaruh negatif, selai itu proporsi perempuan dalam dewan direksi justru berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap greenwashing.


Kebaruan: studi ini memberikan perspektif baru dengan menggabungkan faktor eksternal dan internal dalam memengaruhi greenwashing.


Kontribusi: penelitian ini mengilustrasikan penerapan teori legitimasi, di mana perusahaan mencari legitimasi eksternal melalui eksposur media dan pengungkapan inovasi hijau.

Keywords

greenwash media corporate governance women on board innovation

Article Details

References

  1. Taufiq MI, Lestari DI, Vasudevan A, Adialita T, Hai ST, Rungsuk A. Raising or lowering: Can green accounting and environmental performance affect stock prices when profitability rises? J Infrastruct Policy Dev. 2024 Aug 16;8(8):4416.
  2. De Freitas Netto SV, Sobral MFF, Ribeiro ARB, Soares GRDL. Concepts and forms of greenwashing: a systematic review. Environ Sci Eur. 2020 Dec;32(1):19.
  3. Delmas MA, Burbano VC. The Drivers of Greenwashing. Calif Manage Rev. 2011 Oct;54(1):64–87.
  4. Velte P. Determinants and consequences of corporate social responsibility decoupling—Status quo and limitations of recent empirical quantitative research. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2023 Nov;30(6):2695–717.
  5. Asyari S, Hernawati E. Pengaruh Pengungkapan Emisi Karbon dan Kinerja Lingkungan Terhadap Reaksi Investor Dengan Media Exposure Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. J Akunt Trisakti. 2023 Sept 30;10(2):319–42.
  6. Sarra HD, Alamsyah S. Pengaruh Kinerja Lingkungan, Citra Perusahaan dan Media Exposure Terhadap Pengungkapan CSR. Pros Simp Nas Multidisiplin SinaMu [Internet]. 2021 Mar 30 [cited 2025 June 18];2. Available from: https://jurnal.umt.ac.id/index.php/senamu/article/view/3577
  7. Weng HHR, Chen JS, Chen PC. Effects of green innovation on environmental and corporate performance: A stakeholder perspective. Sustain Switz. 2015;7(5):4997–5026.
  8. Dangelico RM, Pujari D. Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability. J Bus Ethics. 2010 Sept;95(3):471–86.
  9. Hillestad T, Xie C, Haugland SA. Innovative corporate social responsibility: the founder’s role in creating a trustworthy corporate brand through “green innovation”. Abimbola T, editor. J Prod Brand Manag. 2010 Sept 21;19(6):440–51.
  10. Chen J, Zhang Z, Jia M. How CEO narcissism affects corporate social responsibility choice? Asia Pac J Manag. 2021 Sept;38(3):897–924.
  11. Hambrick DC, Mason P a. Echelons : of Reflection The Its Organization as Top a. Management. 1984;9(2):193–206.
  12. Zhang D. Talk the Talk, But Walk the Walk? Female-Managed Firms and Greenwashing Behavior. Environ Behav. 2023 June;55(5):364–94.
  13. Issa A, Fang HX. The impact of board gender diversity on corporate social responsibility in the Arab Gulf states. Gend Manag Int J. 2019 Sept 26;34(7):577–605.
  14. Connelly BL, Certo ST, Reutzel CR, DesJardine MR, Zhou YS. Signaling Theory: State of the Theory and Its Future. J Manag. 2025 Jan;51(1):24–61.
  15. Li L, Saat MM, Khatib SFA, Chu P, Sulimany HGH. Navigating the impact: A comprehensive analysis of ESG disclosure consequences through systematic review. Bus Strategy Dev. 2024 June;7(2):e382.
  16. Kouki A. Does gender diversity moderate the link between CEO dominance and CSR engagement? A two-step system GMM analysis of UK FTSE 100 companies. J Sustain Finance Invest. 2023 Oct 2;13(4):1644–69.
  17. Patten DM, Crampton W. Legitimacy and The Internet: An Examination of Corporate Web Page Environmental Disclosures. In: Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management [Internet]. Bingley: Emerald (MCB UP ); 2003 [cited 2025 June 19]. p. 31–57. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S1479-3598(03)02002-8/full/html
  18. Isenmann R, Lenz C. Internet use for corporate environmental reporting: current challenges—technical benefits—practical guidance. Bus Strategy Environ. 2002 May;11(3):181–202.
  19. Damayanty P, Prihanto H, Fairuzzaman F. Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance, Kepemilikan Saham Publik dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Tingkat Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility. J Ekon Pembang STIE Muhammadiyah Palopo. 2021 Dec 31;7(2):1.
  20. Suchman MC. Approaches and Strategic Managing Legitimacy. Acad Manage Rev. 1995;20(3):571–610.
  21. Simeth M, Cincera M. Corporate Science, Innovation, and Firm Value. Manag Sci. 2016 July;62(7):1970–81.
  22. Adams RB, Ferreira D. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆. J Financ Econ. 2009 Nov;94(2):291–309.
  23. Post C, Byron K. Women on Boards and Firm Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Acad Manage J. 2015 Oct;58(5):1546–71.
  24. Calzolari T, Genovese A, Brint A. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Circular Economy indicators for supply chains : A systematic literature review. Environ Sustain Indic. 2022;13:100160.
  25. Liesen A, Hoepner AG, Patten DM, Figge F. Does stakeholder pressure influence corporate GHG emissions reporting? Empirical evidence from Europe. Account Audit Account J. 2015 Sept 21;28(7):1047–74.
  26. Stanny E, Ely K. Corporate environmental disclosures about the effects of climate change. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2008;15(6):338–48.
  27. Coles J, Daniel N, Naveen L. Boards: Does one size fit all☆. J Financ Econ. 2008 Feb;87(2):329–56.
  28. Amaliyah I, Solikhah B. Pengaruh Kinerja Lingkungan dan Karakteristik Corporate Governance Terhadap Pengungkapan Emisi Karbon. J Econ Manag Account Technol. 2019 Aug 28;2(2):129–41.
  29. Widiastuti H, Utami ER, Handoko R. Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Tipe Industri, Growth, dan Media Exposure Terhadap Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2014-2015). Ris Akunt Dan Keuang Indones. 2018 Oct 13;3(2):107–17.
  30. García-Sánchez IM, Gómez-Miranda ME, David F, Rodríguez-Ariza L. Board independence and GRI-IFC performance standards: The mediating effect of the CSR committee. J Clean Prod. 2019 July;225:554–62.
  31. Erol D, Çankaya S. The impacts of firm-level and country-level variables on Environmental, social and corporate governance greenwashing. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sos Bilim Derg. 2023 June 25;22(46):683–704.