Main Article Content

Abstract

Ketidakstabilan tebing sungai di Desa Sarirejo, Kabupaten Bojonegoro, menjadi ancaman serius bagi keamanan pemukiman warga di sekitarnya. Hasil verifikasi stabilitas lereng eksisting menggunakan metode Bishop menunjukkan bahwa tebing berada dalam kondisi tidak stabil dengan nilai faktor keamanan yang tidak memenuhi syarat (Factor of Safety < 1,50) pada tujuh titik penampang yang ditinjau. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merancang desain bangunan pengaman tebing sungai yang komprehensif guna memitigasi risiko kelongsoran. Metodologi penelitian menggunakan pendekatan analisis numerik hibrida, di mana pemodelan statik struktur utama dilakukan dengan perangkat lunak StaadPro V8i, yang kemudian dikombinasikan dengan perangkat lunak GEO5 untuk verifikasi stabilitas lereng dan perhitungan kapasitas dukung sub struktur. Analisis dilakukan melalui tiga skenario pembebanan utama, yaitu kondisi normal (C1), kondisi banjir (C2) dan kondisi penurunan muka air cepat atau rapid drawdown (C3) dengan mengacu pada standar SNI 1727:2020 dan SNI 8460:2017. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa lendutan maksimum terbesar terjadi pada kondisi rapid drawdown sebesar 10,89 mm. Namun, melalui penerapan desain struktur hibrida yang terdiri dari dinding penahan tanah tipe counterfort, pondasi pancang mini pile 25x25 cm, dan perkuatan Flat Concrete Sheet Piles (FCSP), seluruh komponen struktur dinyatakan aman karena memiliki kapasitas dukung yang melebihi beban kerja yang terjadi. Secara keseluruhan, desain pengaman tebing ini dinyatakan efektif dan memenuhi kriteria keamanan teknis untuk melindungi kawasan bantaran sungai di Desa Sarirejo

Keywords

tebing sungai stabilitas lereng dinding penahan tanah rapid drawdown air tanah

Article Details

References

  1. A. Udomchai, M. Hoy, S. Horpibulsuk, A. Chinkulkijniwat, and A. Arulrajah, “Failure of riverbank protection structure and remedial approach: A case study in Suraburi province, Thailand,” Eng. Fail. Anal., 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.04.040.
  2. E. E. Alonso, “Numerical analysis of rapid drawdown : Applications in real cases,” vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 175–182, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2016.11.003.
  3. B. R. Pandey, H. Knoblauch, and G. Zenz, “Slope Stability Evaluation Due to Reservoir Draw-Down Using LEM and Stress-Based FEM along with Mohr–Coulomb Criteria,” Water, vol. 15, no. 22, 2023, doi: 10.3390/w15224022.
  4. H.-B. Chen, X.-Y. Shao, L. Han, M.-G. Li, F.-Q. Chen, and X.-L. Xie, “A comprehensive prediction of stability against cantilever retaining walls using finite element limit analysis and neural networks model,” KSCE J. Civ. Eng., vol. 29, no. 9, p. 100200, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kscej.2025.100200.
  5. S. Kechidi, A. Colaço, P. Costa, J. Castro, and M. Marques, “Modelling of soil-structure interaction in OpenSees: A practical approach for performance-based seismic design,” Structures, vol. 30, pp. 75–88, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.006.
  6. P. T. K. Sari, I. B. Mochtar, and Y. Lastiasih, “Special Case on Landslide in Balikpapan, Indonesia Viewed from Crack Soil Approach,” KSCE J. Civ. Eng., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2173–2188, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-0402-3.
  7. Badan Standardisasi Nasional, “Penetapan Standar Nasional Indonesia 1727 : 2020 Beban desain minimum dan kriteria terkait untuk bangunan gedung dan struktur lain sebagal revisi dari Standar Nasional Indonesia 1727 : 2013 Beban minimum untuk perancangan bangunan gedung dan,” no. 8, 2020.
  8. S. N. Indonesia and B. S. Nasional, “Persyaratan perancangan geoteknik,” 2017.
  9. R. Ezzeldin, A. Saqr, and M. Abd-Elmaboud, “Hydro-morphologic Variations Induced by Bandal-like Structures for River Bank Protection,” Water Resour. Manag., vol. 40, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s11269-025-04439-5.
  10. S. Khatun, M. Jamal, M. Adil, A. Ghosh, and D. Sen, “Investigation of River Bank Protection Using Riprap Under Drawdown Condition,” Indian Geotech. J., vol. 56, pp. 178–189, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40098-024-01131-0.
  11. C. Zhou, Wenchao, and W. Sui, “Transparent soil model test of a landslide with umbrella-shaped anchors and different slope angles in response to rapid drawdown,” Eng. Geol., 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106765.
  12. B. Viswanadham, R. Saran, and P. Kumar, “Design and development of an in-flight simulator for flooding and drawdown in a geotechnical centrifuge,” Int. J. Phys. Model. Geotech., 2023, doi: 10.1680/jphmg.21.00093.
  13. A. Sajwan and G. Ramana, “Integrating geoinformatics and numerical modelling for landslide back-analysis and forecasting: a proactive mitigation study of the Shiv Bawri landslide,” Landslides, vol. 21, pp. 2481–2499, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10346-024-02321-w.
  14. M. Z. Hasan and Y. Toda, “Enhancing Riverbank Protection along the Jamuna River, Bangladesh: Review of Previous Countermeasures and Morphological Assessment through Groyne-Based Solutions Using Numerical Modeling,” Water, 2024, doi: 10.3390/w16020297.
  15. K. W. Al Shboul, H. A. Rasheed, and H. A. Alshareef, “Intelligent approach for accurately predicting fatigue damage in overhead highway sign structures,” Structures, vol. 34, pp. 3453–3463, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.090.
  16. S. Harabinová, “Assessment of Slope Stability on the Road,” Procedia Eng., vol. 190, pp. 390–397, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.354.
  17. J. P. Panchal, A. M. McNamara, and R. J. Goodey, “Sheet pile groups as an alternative foundation solution to cast-in-situ concrete piles,” Int. J. Phys. Model. Geotech., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 83–96, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.18.00053.
  18. A. Prajapati and H. Rangwala, “Numerical Analysis of Retaining Wall Using Geo-5,” in Analyses for Retaining walls, Slope Stability and Landslides, R. Sarkar, B. K. Maheshwari, and A. Kumar, Eds., Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2025, pp. 61–75.
  19. A. R. Submitted et al., “WALL USING GEO-5 SOFTWARE SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS,” 2020.
  20. N. M. Pinyol, E. E. Alonso, J. Corominas, and J. Moya, “Canelles landslide: modelling rapid drawdown and fast potential sliding,” Landslides, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 33–51, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10346-011-0264-x.