PROJECT PLANNING PEMBANGUNAN JALAN TOL YOGYAKARTA – BAWEN PAKET 1 SEKSI 1 STA.67+500 – STA.76+300

Authors

  • Kautsar Argya Hruhita Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • Joko Setiono Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • Suselo Utoyo Politeknik Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33795/prokons.v18i1.8940

Keywords:

project planning, alternative, elevated, at grade

Abstract

The Yogyakarta–Bawen Toll Road Infrastructure Project Package 1 Section 1 is a government-initiated construction project aimed at enhancing development and connectivity in southern Java. During the construction phase, delays occurred due to suboptimal implementation of pre-determined strategies and methods, resulting in failure to meet the targets for cost, time, and quality. To achieve the cost, time, and quality targets in similar projects, this research focuses on alternative project planning, including project organizational structure, site layout and traffic management, construction methods and strategies, quality planning, Health, Safety, Environment, and Security (HSES) plans, scheduling, and budget execution plans. The development of this alternative project planning required data such as the detailed engineering design (DED), work plans and specifications, unit price analysis, the 2022 Goods and Services Price Standards of Sleman Regency, and support from Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Project for scheduling and budget calculation planning. The final outcomes of the alternative project planning include functional organizational structure, site layout and traffic management planning using calculations of traveling distance and safety index, construction strategies divided into elevated work zones with 4 work areas and at-grade work zones with 5 work areas, quality planning based on work plans, specifications, and technical requirements, HSES planning, including the establishment of an organizational structure, emergency response action plans, IBPRP (Incident-Based Problem Response Plan) tables, efforts to achieve a zero-accident target, HSES support equipment, and HSES scheduling, scheduling planned for a total of 579 working days, budget execution plan amounting to IDR 3,083,558,817,300.

References

Alutbi, M. (2020) ‘BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE ( WBS )’, (June)

Ervianto, W.I. (2023) Manajemen proyek konstruksi. Penerbit Andi.

Hegazy, T. and Elbeltagi, E. (1999) ‘EvoSite: Evolution-based model for site layout planning’, Journal of computing in civil engineering, 13(3).

Hermina, S. et al. (2014) ‘Penerapan Metode Lean Project Management Dalam Perencanaan Proyek Konstruksi (Studi Kasus: Pembangunan Gedung Mantos Tahap Iii)’, Jurnal Sipil Statik.

Husen, A. (2011) Manajemen Proyek Edisi Revisi.

MKJI (1997) ‘Mkji 1997’, departemen pekerjaan umum, ‘Manual Kapasitas Jalan Indonesia’.

Setyobudi, D. and Supani (2017) ‘Optimasi Site Layout pada Proyek Pembangunan Apartemen Pavilion Permata Tower 2’, Jurnal Teknik ITS.

Soeharto, I. (1999) Manajemen Proyek (Dari Konseptual Sampai Operasional ) Jilid 1.

Tommelein, I.D., Levitt, R.E. and Hayes‐Roth, B. (1992) ‘SightPlan Model for Site Layout’, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

[1]
K. A. Hruhita, J. Setiono, and S. Utoyo, “PROJECT PLANNING PEMBANGUNAN JALAN TOL YOGYAKARTA – BAWEN PAKET 1 SEKSI 1 STA.67+500 – STA.76+300”, PJTS, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Feb. 2024.