Performa Antena Directional dan Omnidirectional pada Sistem FPV Walksnail Avatar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33795/elposys.v12i3.8798Keywords:
digital fpv, Walksnail Avatar, directional antenna, omnidirectional antenna, latency, data rateAbstract
Visual monitoring in heavy equipment operations was critical for reducing workplace accidents caused by operator blind spots. Conventional static cameras and sensors often failed to provide adequate coverage in dynamic environments, leading to limitations in situational awareness. This study aimed to evaluate the transmission performance of the Walksnail Avatar digital FPV system using directional and omnidirectional antennas for blind spot monitoring applications. An experimental method was employed by configuring a digital FPV transmitter and receiver at a fixed distance of 20 meters with a wooden obstacle placed along the transmission path. The receiver antenna orientation was rotated at 10-degree intervals to measure variations in data rate and latency. Two antenna configurations were tested: a 9.4 dBi directional patch antenna and a standard omnidirectional antenna. The results indicated that the directional patch antenna achieved a maximum data rate of 25 MBps at frontal orientations but experienced significant degradation at lateral angles, with latency increasing up to 100 ms. In contrast, the omnidirectional antenna demonstrated more uniform performance across all directions, maintaining data rates between 19–24 MBps and stable latency below 45 ms. These findings were consistent with antenna radiation theory regarding gain concentration and angular coverage.The study implied that omnidirectional antennas were more suitable for blind spot monitoring in heavy equipment operations due to their consistent coverage and low latency, while directional antennas were better applied for focused line-of-sight monitoring scenarios. The results provided empirical guidance for selecting antenna configurations in digital FPV-based industrial safety systems.
References
C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2016.
T. S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.
K. Gupta and R. K. Jain, “Heavy Equipment Safety Monitoring Systems: A Review,” International Journal of Mining Engineering, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 45–53, 2020.
H. Liu, Z. Wang, and M. Chen, “Blind Spot Accidents in Construction and Mining: Causes and Mitigation Strategies,” Safety Science, vol. 135, pp. 105–116, 2021.
J. Park and S. Lee, “Applications of Drone FPV Technology for Industrial Monitoring,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 765–779, 2021.
L. Zhang, Y. Chen, and H. Wang, “Experimental Study on FPV Signal Attenuation in Industrial Environments,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 14322–14330, 2022.
S. Yamamoto and K. Ito, “Performance of Digital FPV Systems under Multipath and Obstructed Environments,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 2022.
M. S. Sadiq, A. R. Khan, and M. R. Anjum, “Horizontal Polarized DC-Grounded Omnidirectional Antenna for UAV Ground Control Station,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 8, Art. no. 2763, 2021.
R. Maulana, F. Imansyah, and R. R. Yacoub, “Design and Performance Analysis of 5.8 GHz Cloverleaf and Helix Antenna as First-Person View Video Receiver in Drone Racing,” Journal of Electrical Engineering, Energy, and Information Technology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 406–417, 2024.
V. R. Kandregula, A. Kumar, and S. Mishra, “A Review of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Antenna and Propagation Measurements,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 22, Art. no. 7395, 2024.
G. Nugroho and D. Dectaviansyah, “Design, Manufacture, and Performance Analysis of an Automatic Antenna Tracker for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV),” Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical Power, and Vehicular Technology, 2025.
Walksnail, Walksnail Avatar Digital FPV System Specifications. [Online]. Available: https://www.walksnail.com/avatar-fpv (diakses September 2025).
M. S. Khan, A. D. Capobianco, A. Iftikhar, and B. D. Braaten, “Wideband circularly polarized antennas for wireless systems,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 64–75, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1109/MAP.2020.2970091.
IEEE Std 145-2013, IEEE Standard for Definitions of Terms for Antennas, IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 2014.
R. D’Errico and M. Rossi, “UAV communications for 5G and beyond: Recent advances and future trends,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 5038–5060, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2970813.
M. Al-Hourani, S. Kandeepan, and A. Jamalipour, “Modeling air-to-ground path loss for low altitude platforms in urban environments,” IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), 2014, pp. 2898–2904, doi: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2014.7037155.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Elposys: Jurnal Sistem Kelistrikan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




