Main Article Content

Abstract

Baterai Lithium Polymer (Li-Po) Karena beratnya yang ringan dan kepadatan energinya yang tinggi, banyak digunakan pada berbagai perangkat elektronik. Penelitian ini bertujuan membandingkan kinerja algoritma Decision Tree dan XGBoost dalam memprediksi Time to Full Charge (TTF) baterai Li-Po. Data diperoleh dari sistem monitoring berbasis ESP32 yang mengakuisisi parameter tegangan, arus, suhu, dan State of Charge (SoC) selama proses pengisian baterai. Evaluasi model dilakukan menggunakan metrik Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), dan koefisien determinasi (R²). Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa Decision Tree menghasilkan MAE 44,5892 detik, RMSE 62,08 detik, MAPE 10,82%, dan R² 0,9905. Sementara itu, XGBoost menghasilkan MAE 47,1935 detik, RMSE 63,657 detik, MAPE 7,796%, dan R² 0,9906. Dengan nilai R2 di atas 0,99, kedua algoritma dapat digunakan untuk mengestimasi waktu pengisian baterai Li-Po.

Keywords

Decision Tree Lithium Polymer Machine Learning State of Charge Time to Full Charge XGBoost

Article Details

References

  1. J. Chaoraingern and A. Numsomran, “Embedded Sensor Data Fusion and TinyML for Real-Time Remaining Useful Life Estimation of UAV Li Polymer Batteries,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 12, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.3390/s25123810.
  2. R. Ranjith Kumar, C. Bharatiraja, K. Udhayakumar, S. Devakirubakaran, K. S. Sekar, and L. Mihet-Popa, “Advances in Batteries, Battery Modeling, Battery Management System, Battery Thermal Management, SOC, SOH, and Charge/Discharge Characteristics in EV Applications,” 2023, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3318121.
  3. Y. Wu, D. Bai, K. Zhang, Y. Li, and F. Yang, “Advancements in the estimation of the state of charge of lithium-ion battery: a comprehensive review of traditional and deep learning approaches,” Journal of Materials Informatics, vol. 5, no. 2, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.20517/jmi.2024.84.
  4. H. Hilal and P. Saha, “Forecasting Lithium-Ion Battery Longevity with Limited Data Availability: Benchmarking Different Machine Learning Algorithms,” Dec. 2023, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.05717
  5. W. Guo, Z. Sun, S. B. Vilsen, J. Meng, and D. I. Stroe, “Review of ‘grey box’ lifetime modeling for lithium-ion battery: Combining physics and data-driven methods,” Dec. 01, 2022, Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2022.105992.
  6. H. Blockeel, L. Devos, B. Frénay, G. Nanfack, and S. Nijssen, “Decision trees: from efficient prediction to responsible AI,” 2023, Frontiers Media SA. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1124553.
  7. H. Aboueidah and A. Altahhan, “A Comparison of Baseline Models and a Transformer Network for SOC Prediction in Lithium-Ion Batteries,” Oct. 2024, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17049
  8. C. Lei, “New energy vehicle battery state of charge prediction based on XGBoost algorithm and RF fusion,” Energy Informatics, vol. 7, no. 1, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s42162-024-00424-1.
  9. S. Jafari and Y. C. Byun, “Efficient state of charge estimation in electric vehicles batteries based on the extra tree regressor: A data-driven approach,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 4, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25949.
  10. M. F. Mat Baseri and A. F. Saad, “Dietry Monitoring System Using Decision Tree to Control Human Obesity,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 9–20, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.36079/lamintang.ijai-01001.485.
  11. A. A. Alharbi, “Classification Performance Analysis of Decision Tree-Based Algorithms with Noisy Class Variable,” Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., vol. 2024, 2024, doi: 10.1155/2024/6671395.
  12. M. Wiens, A. Verone-Boyle, N. Henscheid, J. T. Podichetty, and J. Burton, “A Tutorial and Use Case Example of the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Drug Development Applications,” Clin. Transl. Sci., vol. 18, no. 3, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1111/cts.70172.
  13. M. Noorunnahar, A. H. Chowdhury, and F. A. Mila, “A tree based eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) machine learning model to forecast the annual rice production in Bangladesh,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 3 March, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283452.
  14. D. Chicco, M. J. Warrens, and G. Jurman, “The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation,” PeerJ Comput. Sci., vol. 7, pp. 1–24, 2021, doi: 10.7717/PEERJ-CS.623.